I agree on your development direction... of course I'm only one user 
In the meantime, users can script what they need, for instance, in the area of Grandfather/Father/Son (GFS) image management. The only thing missing from the CLI to allow full image mgmt would be the MERGE function... but I don't think that's critical at the moment. Much rather see development of the UI version of image chain mgmt, i.e. GFS, automatic merge & deletion being scheduled.
Currently you have, for Disk Images, a Disk Mode and Partition Mode restore... I guess I don't quite get that necessity. In the Disk Mode restore, you force users to restore the whole disk, in Partition Mode restore you force users to only install single partition at a time. Most imaging Systems will allow a disk mode restore to let the user select whatever partitions in that image he wants restored... so in a 6-partition disk image, the user can select from 1-6 partitions for restoration. If Hasleo followed this method, there would be no need at all for the "partition mode" restoration. Is there a reason why this approach wouldn't be possible with HBS? Just curious... actually, I guess I can see a bit why it's the way it is without any significant partition geometry mgmt or possible partition compression upon restoration, one partition at a time seems safe enough.
This product has come along very well and has been very solid for a lot of us out here in the imaging community. Most are waiting to see where your product roadmap will take it. Keep up the great work!
In the meantime, users can script what they need, for instance, in the area of Grandfather/Father/Son (GFS) image management. The only thing missing from the CLI to allow full image mgmt would be the MERGE function... but I don't think that's critical at the moment. Much rather see development of the UI version of image chain mgmt, i.e. GFS, automatic merge & deletion being scheduled.Currently you have, for Disk Images, a Disk Mode and Partition Mode restore... I guess I don't quite get that necessity. In the Disk Mode restore, you force users to restore the whole disk, in Partition Mode restore you force users to only install single partition at a time. Most imaging Systems will allow a disk mode restore to let the user select whatever partitions in that image he wants restored... so in a 6-partition disk image, the user can select from 1-6 partitions for restoration. If Hasleo followed this method, there would be no need at all for the "partition mode" restoration. Is there a reason why this approach wouldn't be possible with HBS? Just curious... actually, I guess I can see a bit why it's the way it is without any significant partition geometry mgmt or possible partition compression upon restoration, one partition at a time seems safe enough.
This product has come along very well and has been very solid for a lot of us out here in the imaging community. Most are waiting to see where your product roadmap will take it. Keep up the great work!