10-11-2024, 11:28 AM
(10-11-2024, 12:33 AM)Froggie Wrote: Reflect X vs Hasleo v4.9.3
CPU: i7-10700, 8-core/16-thread, 2.9/4.8ghz
RAM: 32gB
Source disk: NvME M2.2280, PCiE v3 (7-part <1 [email protected], 1 unf@16mB, 1 [email protected], 1 [email protected],
-------------------------------------------------------- 1 [email protected], 1 [email protected] & 1 [email protected])
Target disk: NvME M2.2280, PCiE v3
MEDIUM compression, no image checks following imaging operation
Hasleo v4.9.3: 4m 57s (Image size=83.5gB)
Reflect v10: 3m 9s (Image size=71.4)
Remember, Macrium REFLECT X is now using an entirely new streaming compression method, when imaging, obtained from a Facebook developer. As a result, the image format (not the method) is now PUBLIC and available to all if interested.
I'm not sure if Hasleo is able to determine the USED SECTOR amount with EXT<n> images... that may be the main reason for the differences in image sizes. I'm sure the ADMIN (Dev Team rep) will jump in here and correct this assumption, if necessary.
Yes, HBS doesn't support EXT partitions, have you tested not backing up EXT partitions? Sorry we were held back by some issues with other products and didn't have time to test.