Feature REQUESTS

[TechE]

I like this backup suite so much. Though I have a request with the WinPE version to boot to be able to restore hard drives. Is it possible to make the UI not be so tight together in terms of the UI Im assuming its due to screen resolution? Cause I feel some things are a bit to tight of the UI of Backup suite that each time I have to stretch the application out a bit in WinPE so I can see what i'm doing and or looking for.

[admin]

I like this backup suite so much. Though I have a request with the WinPE version to boot to be able to restore hard drives. Is it possible to make the UI not be so tight together in terms of the UI Im assuming its due to screen resolution? Cause I feel some things are a bit to tight of the UI of Backup suite that each time I have to stretch the application out a bit in WinPE so I can see what i'm doing and or looking for.

I've given feedback to my development team, but I don't think there will be any major changes to the interface in the last few releases because we don't have enough manpower.

[TechE]

I like this backup suite so much. Though I have a request with the WinPE version to boot to be able to restore hard drives. Is it possible to make the UI not be so tight together in terms of the UI Im assuming its due to screen resolution? Cause I feel some things are a bit to tight of the UI of Backup suite that each time I have to stretch the application out a bit in WinPE so I can see what i'm doing and or looking for.

I've given feedback to my development team, but I don't think there will be any major changes to the interface in the last few releases because we don't have enough manpower.

Not a problem.  Thanks again for such a great product it works wonderfully. Better then Windows 7 backup that I use to use that haven't had any updates in years. So I felt it was time I look for a replacement and came across this one after using AOEMI Backupper for less then 2 days I found it sorta confusing and got tired of the ads plus it sorta broke my first backup oddly perhaps that was my fault.

[chmichael]

ZSTD 1.5.7 please - https://www.phoronix.com/news/Zstd-Zstandard-1.5.7

[Froggie]

ZSTD 1.5.7 please - https://www.phoronix.com/news/Zstd-Zstandard-1.5.7

As Developers, I'm sure you'll slow down in reference to these bleeding edge requests (especially after moving to Zstd recently with the gains you already implemented  )  ... especially with only potential 10% gains in compression with NTFS clusters.  Please give the scheme some time to "evolve"...

[admin]

ZSTD 1.5.7 please - https://www.phoronix.com/news/Zstd-Zstandard-1.5.7

As Developers, I'm sure you'll slow down in reference to these bleeding edge requests (especially after moving to Zstd recently with the gains you already implemented  )  ... especially with only potential 10% gains in compression with NTFS clusters.  Please give the scheme some time to "evolve"...

This is a huge improvement, however the size of the data blocks used by HBS is larger than 128KB, so the improvement does not result in a performance gain for HBS.